The following case illustrated how the Inland Revenue Board (IRB) in Malaysia looked at the function
of assets claimed and their eligibility of claiming capital allowances.I found it very interesting as to how the Special Commissioners looked and allowed the appellant's claim as opposed to how the IRB handled the case in the first place.
In the case of HHM Sdn Bhd v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam
Negeri, the appellant had claimed reinvestment allowance for the following
projects under appeal:
- forklifts;
- ramps;
- sprocket;
- oil
pump; and
- crankshaft.